Proposed future zoning from tonight's Planning Commission Presentation. |
Gentle readers, tonight is a very important meeting of the Planning Commission. Here's the agenda.
Call to action: please call or write Planning Commission. Tell them that you support the new Comprehensive Land Use Plan but that they should skip the Retail Hub and Innovation Hub districts. While you are at it, encourage smaller minimum lot sizes and a larger and taller downtown.
The consultants who have been working on the updated Comprehensive Land Use Plan will be presenting their proposal for the new plan. I've been a member of the Comprehensive Land Use Steering Committee, which has advised the consultants during the duration of this process.
Overall I think the proposed plan does a great job of addressing the goals Council set forth: improving affordability, equity, and sustainability.
Now I am going to nitpick.
- I want to make sure that in the low rise residential district, the maximum height is at least 45' and that minimum lot size is no more than 1200 sq ft. This will help to maximize affordability by reducing land costs for projects. It will allow more people to live near transit and their workplaces improving sustainability. You can read more about my lot size thoughts here: Legalize Cottage Courts.
- The Core/Downtown Hub district should be expanded. It should reach at least south to Hoover, east to Washtenaw, and north to the river. I also think the North Main Corridor should be Core/Downtown Hub. This area is well served by transit and close to amenities like the Border to Border Trail. I'd love to see some high rises here to great people when the enter the city from the North. Expanding downtown will have the added benefit of making it more costly for U of M to expand into city land. There should also be no height limit for this district. It's wild that Ann Arbor made one tall building in 1969 and has not built anything even close to that height since then. Bring on true skyscrapers. They skyline is looking too uniform and boxy. As for the case for expanding downtown, check out Abdul Ateya's article here: Improving Housing Affordability by Expanding Downtown.
- Finally, I don't think there is any need for the Innovation and Retail districts. My understanding is that these districts would limit the amount of housing that can be built in these zones. To put it plainly, we are in a housing crisis, not a strip mall crisis--well not the sort of crisis where we need to preserve our existing strip malls. These districts go beyond the mandates that council set forth and they add needless complication to the zoning code. If you would like to take a deep dive into this, please check out the Leaf-Levin Memo: Restrictive Districts.