Thursday, October 2, 2025

2025 on pace to be Ann Arbor's worst for pedestrian crashes: an interview with Crashes in Ann Arbor's Peter Houk

Serious and fatal pedestrian crashes by year from Crashes in Ann Arbor. 2025 data is year to date.

Ann Arbor has an ambitious Vision Zero target of eliminating serious and fatal pedestrian crashes by the end of the year. Despite this, 2025 is on pace to be the worst year for serious and fatal pedestrian crashes in in the city. The data above run through September, and if this report from r/annarbor is correct, another pedestrian was seriously injured by a driver last night. This means the city has already tied 2014's record with 3 months left in the year. 

To commemorate this ignoble occasion, I have interviewed Peter Houk who run's the website CrashesInAnnArbor. CiAA is a project that examines crashes in Ann Arbor that result in serious injuries to vulnerable roadway users. 

Damn Arbor: Can you tell me a little about Crashes in Ann Arbor? What it is and why you created the website?

Peter Houk: Crashes in Ann Arbor is a project examining traffic crashes on Ann Arbor streets that result in a serious or fatal injury to a pedestrian, cyclist or other vulnerable roadway user.  I started it because I was frustrated by how long it took for crash data to become easily available to the public.  Depending on when the crash happened, it might have been 18 months before the report was released on the Michigan Traffic Crash Facts website.  So a crash could happen in your neighborhood, and the official police report won't be available to the public for at least 6 months and up to 18 months.  How many times are you going to drive through that same place before you are informed about the hazardous conditions there?  

I was also frustrated about how this delay inhibited a meaningful response to crashes by city departments. I had been told that the city staff would look at all serious and fatal crashes and react to them if necessary, but the results were not shared publicly.  Further, if the existence of a crash and the details that contributed to it aren't public, then we are missing an important feedback loop between advocates/residents, their elected representatives, and city staff.  Residents who frequent a particular location where a crash has occurred are familiar with it in a way that elected representatives and city staff can't possibly be for every location in the city.  Their user experience can help contribute important information about how a location might be made safer.  But if these important stakeholders don't know the details of a crash or even that it occurred, they can't talk with their city council members about it in a meaningful way.

DA:  What stands out to you in the latest analysis of Ann Arbor crash data?

PH: Two very bad years in a row for pedestrian crashes; two years in a row of improvement for bicycle crashes.  It's possible that we won't have any more pedestrian crashes in 2025 (though unlikely).  Looking at the past 20 years, we average almost three serious/fatal pedestrian crashes in the 4th quarter of the year.  If we continue at that rate for the rest of 2025, the total will hit 15, which we haven't seen since 2014.  

DA:  2025 is on pace to be the worst year for pedestrian crashes since you have been keeping track. Do you care to speculate on the causes? 

PH: Ann Arbor has experienced a record increase in employment driven mostly by the University, and at the same time our population has remained stable or even declined.  So we can assume that more people are commuting into and out of the city each day.  This results in more cars driving more miles on city streets, as well as more people walking and biking locally, and more opportunities for conflict; note that most drivers are also pedestrians while they are at their destination.  With this unprecedented level of traffic, we need to focus on fixing hazards at crash sites and locations with similar designs and conditions.

We have also let lapse our focus on targeted enforcement at crosswalks, which we did in 2017 and 2018, and which improved driver compliance by over 30% at some locations. We know this works, but we stopped doing it.  Similarly, we stopped doing public education, like the A2 Be Safe multi-media campaign, to inform and remind the public about safety on our streets (and other places).  We used to have a City Administrator who was a champion for safe streets, but the previous City Council majority fired him in 2020.  

And all of this is playing out against the backdrop of a transportation system that still has the fundamental flaw of mixing high speed vehicle traffic with vulnerable users like pedestrians.  Posted speed limits are up to 45 MPH on Washtenaw and other streets, and we know that people often drive even faster.   

We stopped doing things that worked; we stopped actively promoting a culture of safety for roadway users.  None of us should be overly surprised by the results. 

DA:  Conversely, 2025 is trending as a super safe year for bicyclists on Ann Arbor streets. Do you have thoughts on this phenomenon? 

PH:  So far in 2025, we haven't received any reports of traffic crashes that killed or seriously injured a cyclist.  But we don't usually have many of those in most years.  Even if we finish the year with zero (and I hope we do) this apparent decline might be due to year-over-year variation.

But it might also be attributable to the fact that more people are riding bikes.  My unscientific observation has been that there are more bikes out there since life returned to normal after COVID.  And there were record bicycle sales during COVID when many people were looking for more outdoor activities.  Bike counters in the downtown bike lanes show bike traffic increases year-over-year.  More riders, combined with some high profile cycletrack infrastructure projects in Downtown, might increase driver's awareness of bike riders throughout the city. 

DA:  What’s one thing you hope readers will take away from the report you are releasing? 

PH:  Ann Arbor committed to vision zero by 2025, but we haven't followed through on it.  Instead our pedestrians are probably going to have the worst year since we first adopted the goal of zero traffic fatalities and serious injuries.  

DA:  Is there anything else you would like to add? 

PH: 2025 is on track to be a very bad year; when the official 2025 data gets released next year, it's probably going to be the worst year since 2014.  But it doesn't have to be the worst year **on record** if we make meaningful changes now.  The city already has some good programs underway like the Safety Corridors where AAPD is doing targeted enforcement for unsafe driving behaviors.  I would like to see that program expanded to include targeted crosswalk enforcement.  City Transportation Engineering has started taking an active role in analyzing fatal and very serious injury crashes.  I would like to see that level of scrutiny applied to all serious crashes as well.  We have done media outreach programs and targeted enforcement in recent history, so we should be able to restart them quickly.  

We also have in progress right now a study to reconfigure our multi-lane streets.  This effort is our best chance to change our streets to have slower but more consistent and smoothly-flowing traffic.  If done right, drivers will spend more of their travel time going at slower speeds but less time stopped at red lights.  Fundamental changes like these are the way to make sure that 2026 and beyond have fewer serious crashes than 2025.  The Ann Arbor Roadway Rightsizing project has a community engagement event on November 19 at AADL.   

Also in progress right now, the city is negotiating to take back control of trunk lines (Jackson, Huron, Washtenaw and N. Main) from MDOT.  None of the really ambitious changes that we need to keep pedestrians safe will be able to happen until the city has control of these major streets.  The negotiation started last year and no updates on progress have been shared recently.    

We need to do what we can to keep 2025 from getting worse, and we need that momentum to carry into 2026 so that we can make it the *best* year on record.  And anyone who says that won't happen just needs to look at 2014 and 2015--the current worst and best years on record--to see that it can be done. 

Thanks for letting me share this with your readers.

You can follow CrashesinAnnArbor on the web and Blue Sky.

Thursday, September 18, 2025

It's Neighborhood Week!

 

Headliner events for Neighborhood Week

Gentle readers, this week is Neighborhood Week. This is a week of events focused on advocacy around housing, transportation, and vision for Ann Arbor's future. It is being hosted by the Neighborhood Institute, Neighbors for More Neighbors A2, and the University of Michigan Urbanism Club. 

While events have been occurring all week, the headline events kick off tonight with Neighborhood Fundamentals: Housing, Transportation, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. This event is from 7-9 PM at Blau Hall, Room B1580. It will cover:

Why is it so hard to rent or buy in Ann Arbor? What are our barriers to walking, biking, or taking transit? How can we envision a better future? Designed for newcomers to housing, planning, and transportation safety activism, these expert-led conversations will cover the essentials of how we got here — and where we're going. Dinner at 7pm, while talks begin at 7:15pm.
Sounds great, but I want to know what dinner will be. There are tons of other great events this week including Parking Day, the Green Fair, and Bikeapalooza. You don't want to miss it. 

Monday, September 15, 2025

Ann Arbor City Council Preview: September 15, 2025

 

RETVRN

Gentle readers, it's #a2Council night in Ann Arbor. Here's the agenda

The evening kicks off with a substantial, 19-item consent agenda. Of note, CA-16, resolution to authorize the administrator to sell development rights for 415 W Washington and 309 S Ashley (Kline Lot). Exciting to see these moving forward. 

There are no public hearings on the docket this evening but there are 4 ordinance first readings. C-1 is for rezoning of 4.16 Acres from O (Office District) to R4E (Multiple-Family Dwelling District). This is for "The Crescent" development at 2525 Ann Arbor-Saline Road. This project will bring 262 new dwellings to an area well served with transit. You love to see it. 

C-2 is to rezone 0.11 Acre from P (Parking) to C1 (Local Commercial) at 1007 Woodlawn Ave in Lower Burns Park. This is a small change, but it's great to get rid of parking. 

C-3 updates the city's rules on purchasing, contracting, and selling. And C-4 adds a new chapter on Temporary Reduction of Distance Requirements Between K-12 Schools and Marijuana Facilities in they city's marijuana rules. 

On to the resolutions. DC-1 is a resolution to appoint Karlene Goetz to the Public Market Advisory Commission as a Non-registered Elector. DC-2 is a Resolution to Correct the Appointment of Julie Lynch to the Employees Retirement System Board of Trustees. DC-3 is a resolution for Bicentennial Park Improvements. 

DC-4 is a resolution to affirm the city's support for the Treeline Trail Project. Spoiler: we don't support the Treeline largely do to the opportunity cost of the project versus building actually useful non-motorized infrastructure. Read more here

DC-5 is a resolution to revise the remainder of the 2025 Council Calendars. 

That's all there is. Should be pretty short. Make sure to follow the blow by blow tonight with the #a2Council hashtag on Bluesky. 

Monday, August 18, 2025

Ann Arbor City Council Preview: August 18, 2025

 


Gentle reader, it's #a2Council night in Ann Arbor. Here's the agenda.

The night kicks off with a modest, 13-item consent agenda. The first 4 items are all street closures. CA-1 is for Michigan's home football games. CA-2 is for the UMCU Touchdown Tailgate. CA-3 is for a Pure Barre Pop-up on Sept 20th. CA-4 is for the annual Turkey Trot. 

There is one public hearing on the agenda. PH-1/DS-1 is for the Fire Department's new Fee Schedule. 

On to the resolutions! There is only one other than DS-1. DC-1 is to amend council committee appointments for 2025. 

That's all there is. Should be pretty short. Make sure to follow the blow by blow tonight with the #a2Council hashtag on Bluesky. 

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Election Endorsement: Vote Yes on Props A and B to support the Library

"Earth Day Celebration 2020, Center of the City Parking Deck" by Scott Trudeau. Proposals A and B would give the Ann Arbor District Library the opportunity to do something more with the Library Lot.

Vote Yes on Props A and B.

Gentle reader, the polls are open. If you are able to vote in the City of Ann Arbor, I think you should vote Yes on Props A and B. Libraries are good. Props A and B will get the community more library. Libraries are good, more library is better. Props A and B get Ann Arbor more library. You should vote for good things and that is why you should vote yes on these two city proposals.

Vote Yes for more libraries.

Props A and B would allow the Ann Arbor District Library (AADL) to fund a tremendous new downtown library by selling the development rights above the library to a developer who would build housing. Libraries are such incredible resources for the communities they serve. They are one of the few places in our community that can provide services without having to worry about a profit motive, which is really incredible when you think about it. The AADL is an outstanding library system that has shown itself to be dynamic and creative in the evolving ways it serves our community.

Vote Yes for a more sustainable, affordable, and equitable Ann Arbor.

Props A and B would allow AADL to sell air rights above the Library Lot to a developer. This in turn would allow the construction of dense housing on the site in addition to a new downtown library. More housing would help improve Ann Arbor’s housing shortage and reduce housing prices. More housing allows more people to access the city’s excellent amenities, such as the AAATA, AADL, and the Ann Arbor Public Schools. More downtown housing is sustainable because it is less carbon intensive, and allows people to live car-light or carless lives.

Furthermore, when building the Library Lane Parking Structure, an additional $15m was spent to build a superstructure that could support a 17 story building. It is important to be good stewards of the resources entrusted to us. It is a poor use of our planet’s scarce resources to not build a large structure on the Library Lot.

Vote Yes to get rid of a downtown surface lot.

The Library Green Conservancy (LGC), The Activating Committee, and the Council of the Commons have failed to build momentum behind their vision for the Library Lot. They have had no support on council since 2022. These groups have failed to build a broad base of support outside of their core members. They have had 7 years and nothing to show for it. According to former AADL Director Josie Parker, the LGC has a trackrecord of failing to act in good faith with the Library. LGC has shown themselves to poor stewards of Ann Arbor's resources. Some have even suggested they don't really want a park on the site so much as they want to prevent housing from being built there. This is especially true after the LGC dumped $10s of thousands of dollars they had raised in support of their park vision into opposing Props A and B in a legally dubious maneuver. If they truly supported a public park on the site, why not donate that money to the AADL and work together for a shared vision of a park?

The LGC has had 7 years to develop their vision for the Library Lot and nothing to show for it. Vote yes on Props A and B to give the AADL the opportunity to build something great for the entire community on the Library Lot. The AADL has a strong record of being a conscientious and trusted steward of Ann Arbor's Resrouces. They will build something great for the community with your support.

Previously:

Letter to Damn Arbor: The Library Green Conservancy and AADL
Guest Opinion: Put the Library Lot back on the ballot in 2023
Guest Opinion: Desolate and Uninviting—The Failure of 2018’s Proposal A and the Future of the Library Lot

Thursday, July 31, 2025

Exclusive: Complaint filed against Ann Arbor's Library Green Conservancy for Michigan Campaign Finance Act violation

 

A screenshot of the complaint filed against the Library Green Conservancy 

Andrew Robbins, a researcher at  U of M, has filed a complaint against the Library Green Conservancy (LGC) for violating the Michigan Campaign Finance Act. Under the Michigan Campaign Finance Act 501(c)(3)s like the LGC are limited in their ability to spend money advocating for specific candidates or ballot initiatives. 

The complaint against the LGC alleges the following:

The Library Green Conservancy (LGC), a Michigan 501(c)(3) organization, is in violation of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act by having spent over $500.00 on campaign advocacy related to a ballot question without having registered as a ballot question committee and without having disclosed their expenditures. 

LGC have caused themselves to meet the definition of a ballot question committee under MCL 169.203(4) through expenditures exceeding $500.00 in a calendar year. Despite this, they have not registered as a ballot question committee. Their communications meet the requirements for express words of defeat under MCL 169.206(2)(j), and their expenditures in calendar year 2025 have exceeded $500.00 as described under MCL 169.254(3)

Examples of language designed to persuade voters to vote no include: 

"Proposals A & B are not needed to replace the downtown library." 

"Proposals A & B would allow the sale of valuable downtown public land for $1 for private development" 

"Proposals A & B would [...] overturn the will of the majority of 2018 voters." 

"Proposals A & B are NOT needed for a new library." 

"Proposals A & B are misleading." 

"YOU CAN VOTE AGAINST PROPOSALS A & B AND STILL GET A NEW LIBRARY!" 

"The park we voted for is under attack!" 

"Proposals A & B are the 1st step toward the goal [...] to sell our Parks and Park Land to High Rise Building Developers" 

Direct attacks against elected officials, including AADL president Molly Kleinman.

The complaint contains evidence, including statements made by the LGC's attorney, Tom Wieder, that the LGC spent $59,000 advocating against Proposals A and B. 

Though it is probably too late to directly impact the vote on Proposals A and B, it will be interesting to see how this complaint plays out. Stay tuned for more on this story as it develops. 



Monday, July 28, 2025

Letter to Damn Arbor: The Library Green Conservancy and AADL

NOTE: This is a letter to Damn Arbor from former AADL Director, Josie Parker. If you'd like to submit a Letter to Damn Arbor, please send it to damn.arbor@gmail.com. 

The Library Green Conservancy's Observer Ad


When I first saw the Library Green Conservancy’s full-page ad in the Observer, insinuating that an unrealistic rendering of a building over the Library Lane garage, was actually an AADL document, I was reminded yet again of how this group is willing to sacrifice the good reputation of the AADL to meet its own ends. A number of years ago, there was another drawing showing a walkway from William Street through to the parking garage rooftop across the properties of the AADL and the University of MI Credit Union. Seeing the published rendering was the first that AADL knew of its existence and there was no answer to our queries of what was intended. We did, however, have to spend a lot of time reassuring our neighbors and the general public that the rendering was not an AADL document. 

It seems that this group knows it has failed to deliver on its promises from when the ballot proposal designating the public property owned by the city as "The Center of the City” was passed in 2018. Many years later, nothing has changed, and the Library Green Conservancy seems determined to take no responsibility for that. I am sadly not surprised. 

From the moment that a paid worker gathering signatures for the initial 2018 ballot initiative stopped me in front of a library branch and asked me to sign so that the Library’s proposal for a park could go on the ballot, I knew that the AADL was being used. When I challenged a leader of the Library Green Conservancy, I got a smirk and a shrug. Years later after failed attempts to raise money and deliver on their promises, they approached the AADL about financially contributing to an investment opportunity to support their work. I declined after explaining that it would be an unlawful use of library funds and I was very disappointed at having been solicited. Once again, I got the smirk and the shrug. 

I remember seeing a name listed among the Library Green Conservancy’s supporters I was surprised to see there. When asked, these claimed supporters were also surprised to hear they were on a list of supporters of an organization they decidedly did not support. This has happened to local businesses as well. A smirk and a shrug. 

Over the years the AADL met with the Library Green Conservancy several times, because an activated public space in that area serves all of the community’s interests. Our efforts were met with ridiculous, unworkable proposals, such as a cryptocurrency that would be unique to their Commons, or drawings playing fast and loose with scale, showing large mature trees growing in surface pits. They would propose that the Commons could include meeting rooms and art galleries and develop collections of local history. Just like a library. 

The Center of the City’s infrequent events, usually announced on short notice, accompanied by last-minute requests for Library support, became a challenge for the library services running next door. They would close the parking lot for a weekend and hold a 12 hour event with just a handful of attendees. They would drape cables unsafely down the parking structure stairs or leave equipment on site after their event permit had ended. Alcohol was sold at one of their events, without a permit, just steps from the Library. 

Ultimately we came to the realization that distancing the operations of the AADL from the Center of the City was the wise and prudent choice. 

Now, when the City and the AADL are working together to make the corner of 5th and William and the parking garage roof a place to live, work and play for generations, the Library Green Conservancy with their ads and mailers are once again trying to misuse a beloved and valued public institution’s reputation, and for what? They don’t appear to be serious about developing the area as a park. They are accountable to no-one and take no responsibility for their lack of progress since 2018. Shouldn’t an organization that wants to be responsible for public space take some responsibility for their work on that public space? I think it is worth the public’s time to ask them. 

I hope that those of you who vote in the City of Ann Arbor will see through the Library Green Conservancy’s attempts to confuse the public and avoid accountability, and vote yes on Proposals A & B by August 5th. We’ve all seen what they can do with the surface of a parking garage. Now let’s see what the Library can do with it.

Monday, July 21, 2025

Ann Arbor City Council Preview: July 21, 2025

 


Gentle reader, it's #a2Council Night in Ann Arbor. Here's the agenda

The night kicks off with a respectable, 21-item consent agenda. The first 6 items are street closures. CA-1 is for Ann Arbor Pride, CA-2 is for the UA Block Party, CA-3 is for Move-In, CA-4 is for Festifall, CA-5 is for GoBlueMix, CA-6 is for the Autumnal Green Fair. That's a lot of street closures!

CA-7 is the development agreement for the Braun Court mid-rise. CA-8 is the development agreement for the townhouses going in at 318 E Jefferson. 

There are 5 public hearings on the docket this evening. PH-1/B-1 is for some changes to the UDC. PH-2/B-2 incorporates changes to citizen participation rules for Planning Commission. PH-3/B-3 is for a routine township annexation for 5.9 acres at 255-371 Scio Church, 2180 Ann Arbor-Saline. PH-4/DB-1 is for the the site plan for the above address, which will be called 75 South Main. PH-5/DS-1 is for the first amendment to the Broadway Park Brownfield Plan. 

DC-1 is a resolution to appoint Jessica Francis to the Independent Community Police Oversight Commission. DC-2 is for the reappointment of a non-registered elector, Michelle Merusi, to the Local Development Finance Authority (LDFA). 

DC-3 is this evening's spicy chili. The vaguely titled Resolution Regarding the Draft Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CULP). This resolution requests Planning Commission make several additions to the CULP. My take is that this is an attempt to placate the Pause the Plan folks. It also specifically authorizes an amendment to the contract with Interface Studios for the additional extension of time and the creation of an additional iteration of the Draft Plan, and to support attendance at upcoming public meetings at an amount not to exceed $83,300, for a total revised contract of $883,990. This probably deserves a whole article on its own. I'll just say to listen to public commentary tonight. 

And that's all there is. If you want to follow the blow by blow tonight, make sure you check out the #a2Council hashtag on Bluesky. 

Monday, July 7, 2025

Ann Arbor City Council Preview: July 7, 2025

 


Gentle readers, tonight is #a2Council night. Here's the agenda

The evening kicks off with a modest, 14-item consent agenda. CA-1 is an update to the site plan for 625 Church Street. CA-2 is an update to the site plan for 303 Detroit Street. 

There are no public hearings nor ordinance first readings on the agenda tonight. 

There is but one resolution on the docket this evening. DC-1 is a resolution approving the recommendation of the City Administrator for the Timing of Bond Issuance for the Arbor South Project. This is probably tonight's spiciest chili. The big question here is how involved the city should be in the parking structure for new South Town project. 

And that's all there is. If you want to follow the blow by blow tonight, make sure you check out the #a2Council hashtag on Bluesky. 

Friday, June 6, 2025

NPNA Yard Sale tomorrow in Ypsilanti's Normal Park

 


The Normal Park Neighborhood Association annual multi-family yard sale is tomorrow. There will be close to 100 homes selling things in what many consider to be the nation's premier yard sale. Stop by and say hi.